Releasing Your Music

CD Baby vs DistroKid: Pay Per Release or Pay Per Year?

By Mike · Published July 18, 2026

After DistroKid vs TuneCore, this is the other distribution matchup we get asked about, and it’s really a question about business models wearing a question about companies. CD Baby and DistroKid both put your music on every platform that matters. The difference is how you pay and what happens to your catalog over time, and once you see the models clearly, your answer usually picks itself.

The two models in one paragraph each

DistroKid is a subscription. One annual fee covers unlimited releases while you keep paying, and you keep 100% of your streaming royalties. Upload as much as you want; the meter never runs per song. The catch lives at the other end: your music stays on platforms only while the subscription is active, so your catalog carries a small annual rent forever, and add-ons that feel like they should be included can stack onto the base price.

CD Baby is pay-once-per-release. A one-time fee per single or album, no annual anything, and the release stays up, in principle, for good. The trade: CD Baby keeps a percentage of your streaming royalties (historically around 9%), so the release you paid for once keeps paying a small toll on everything it earns. Exact fees and percentages shift over time at both companies, so verify current numbers before deciding; the shapes of the deals are what’s stable.

The math is just your release pace

Run your own numbers, but the crossover logic is simple. If you release frequently (a single every month or two, the waterfall strategy crowd), DistroKid’s flat fee divided across many releases beats paying CD Baby per single, and the royalty percentage you keep matters more the more streams you accumulate. If you release rarely (an album every couple of years, an EP and then silence while you tour it), paying once and owning the release without an annual meter is calmer and often cheaper, and CD Baby’s percentage costs you little because, honestly, the toll on modest streaming numbers is modest money.

There’s also a set-and-forget test that has nothing to do with math: if there’s a real chance you’ll stop paying attention to music admin someday (bands go dormant; solo projects hibernate), a missed DistroKid renewal takes your catalog offline, while a CD Baby release keeps sitting there. For legacy-minded catalogs, that failure mode is worth real weight.

Beyond the pricing: what each does well

CD Baby carries some old-school services from its indie-store roots that DistroKid doesn’t bother with: physical distribution (actual CDs and vinyl into their store and partners), sync licensing representation you can opt into, and publishing royalty collection add-ons. If physical product or sync pitching is part of your plan, that bundle is genuinely convenient. DistroKid’s strengths are speed and workflow: releases go live fast, the HyperFollow pre-save pages generate automatically for every release, and features for frequent releasers (scheduled dates, easy splits with collaborators) reflect a product built around the modern single-every-six-weeks cadence.

Both handle the basics fine: all major platforms, artist profile management, and the ordinary mechanics of release week. Neither will promote your music, whatever the upsell screens imply; distribution is trucking, not marketing.

The verdict

Choose DistroKid if you release often, plan to keep releasing, and want to keep every royalty point as your streams grow. The annual fee is the cost of running an active catalog, and for an active artist it’s the better deal almost every time. Choose CD Baby if you release occasionally, want releases that outlive your attention span, or want physical and sync services under the same roof. And whichever you pick, the advice from the TuneCore comparison stands: the distributor is the least important decision in your release. The song, the list, and the plan are the parts that determine whether anyone shows up to stream what you distributed.